Value tree · Facilities management

The facilities management value tree

Facilities management sells contracted service across an estate you do not own. Value is decided per work order and per asset, in the gap between what the contract promised and what the field actually did.

Drivers 24 across four branches See also Facility 360 Metrics 12 linked

01 The same tree, this industry

Where the money is made and lost here

The structure does not change: value is profit plus how well that profit becomes cash, profit is revenue minus cost, and revenue is price times quantity. What changes is which drivers sit underneath each branch, and which system holds them. If you have not read the general version, start with the Enterprise Value Tree and come back.

What is different here

Two units carry everything here: the work order and the asset. Revenue is contracted against an estate; cost is incurred by a technician standing in front of a specific piece of equipment. When those two records cannot be joined, neither contract profitability nor asset performance exists.

Every driver below names the metric it lands on. Follow one and you get its formula, the system the number lives in, and the ways it is commonly misread.

06 Where the numbers live

The systems behind the branches

A value tree is only usable once each box maps to a system and a record. These are the six that matter most in facilities management: what each one is actually for, the records inside it the tree depends on, and which branch it feeds.

SystemWhat it holdsKey recordsFeeds
CAFM / IWMSThe contract and the estate: sites, assets, SLAs, planned maintenance schedules and every work order raised against them.Site, Asset, Contract, Work order, SLA, PPM schedulePrice, quantity, cost
Field service / mobileWhat the technician actually did: time on site, parts used, photos and the sign-off that makes it billable.Job, Technician, Time entry, Part used, SignatureCost, cash
Asset registerThe equipment itself: make, model, criticality, history and remaining life — the record that decides repair or replace.Asset, Class, Condition, Service history, WarrantyCost, quantity
HR and rosteringEstablishment, shifts, skills and certifications, which gate who can attend which asset.Employee, Roster, Skill, CertificationCost
Procurement and inventoryParts, subcontractors and the item master that decides whether two sites can compare a price.Item, Supplier, Purchase order, Van stockCost, cash
BMS / IoTLive plant data from the estate: runtime, alarms and consumption, the leading indicator ahead of a failure.Point, Alarm, Reading, MeterCost, quantity

Almost every hard question in facilities management needs two of these joined. That join — not the calculation — is the work.

07 Where it leaks

Value lost between two systems

These are the losses that no single system can see, because the evidence is split across two of them. Each one is a real number that stays invisible until the join exists — which is why the tree is an integration exercise before it is an analysis one.

Where value leaksWhy it happensThe join that finds it
Work done, never billedA job is completed in the field and the variation approval, photo or signature that makes it billable is missing, so it ages quietly into an unbilled balance.Join the field job record to the contract billing rule and flag the gap daily
The same asset under several identitiesAn asset is tagged differently in the CAFM, the asset register and the client's own system, so failure history never accumulates against the thing that keeps failing.Resolve asset identity across CAFM, field service and the client estate
Reactive work funded as plannedFixed-price contracts assume a planned-to-reactive ratio. When reactive grows, the contract is losing money months before the P&L shows it.Join work order type to contract profitability, monthly, per site
Subcontract margin invisibleSpecialist work is bought per job and sold inside a bundled rate, so the margin on it is never measured per trade or per supplier.Join subcontractor invoices to the work order and the contract rate applied
SLA penalties calculated by the clientResponse and rectification times exist in your own system, but the credit note is built from the client's numbers because yours cannot be produced fast enough.Join response and rectification timestamps to the SLA definition, continuously

08 Worked example

A contract that grew and stopped earning

In practice

Revenue on a multi-site contract rose 9% while contribution fell. The tree splits it: reactive work displaced planned, subcontract cover filled the gap at a bought-in rate, repeat visits rose because asset history was fragmented, and a month of completed work sat unbilled waiting for variation approvals.

ComponentEffectWhat sits behind it
Additional works+€0.9mProject revenue sold into the estate
Reactive displacement−€0.6mPlanned ratio fell on eleven sites
Subcontract cover−€0.4mBought-in trades at contract rates
Repeat visits−€0.3mFirst-time fix down; asset history split
Unbilled work−€0.2mCompleted, awaiting variation approval
Net−€0.6mMore activity, less contribution

Illustrative figures, shown to demonstrate the split. The point is the shape of the walk, not the numbers — on your own data the same bridge is built from your ledger.

09 Diagnostics

Six questions to ask in facilities management

Ask them of your own team before anyone asks them of you. In most organisations at least two of these cannot be answered without a manual exercise, and those two are the plan.

  • Can you produce profitability for one contract this month, including unbilled work?
  • What is your planned-to-reactive ratio by site, and which direction is it moving?
  • Is an asset that has failed four times identifiable as the same asset in every system?
  • How much completed work is sitting unbilled right now, and what is each job waiting for?
  • Do you calculate SLA credits, or does the client tell you what they are?
  • What is field wrench time as a share of paid time, and how would you evidence it?

11 Questions

Frequently asked

What is the single most valuable join in FM?

Work order to asset, with a resolved asset identity. It turns a list of jobs into a service history, which is what makes repair-or-replace, first-time-fix and reactive-ratio all answerable.

Why does the planned-to-reactive ratio matter so much?

Because a fixed-price contract is priced on an assumed ratio. Reactive work costs more per job, arrives unscheduled and breaks the roster, so a drift of a few points turns a profitable contract into a loss long before the annual review.

How should out-of-scope work be handled?

Captured in the field, at the moment it is identified, against the contract scope definition. Anything reconstructed later is a negotiation rather than a bill.

Does this work across a mixed estate?

It is designed for one. The point of resolving assets and standardising the item master is exactly that thirty sites bought different equipment from different suppliers under different codes.

See this tree on your own data

Connect the systems above, define each box once, and the tree stops being a slide.

Book a live demo