Program 07 · Domain specialisation

SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI EngineerFMCG & CPG

A brand owner sells to a retailer and the shopper buys from that retailer. Everything difficult about this industry follows from that gap: your demand signal is someone else’s data, on their calendar, in their hierarchy, and the money you spend with them comes back as a deduction you have to argue about months later.

  • 80 hrstaught
  • 40hands-on AI labs
  • 8assessment tests
  • +20 hrs2 E2E capstones
Sell-in vs sell-outThe distinction that invalidates most consumer-goods models
Master dataWhere these programmes fail, before any modelling begins
Trade spendA large budget settled through disputed deductions
BaselineThe counterfactual every promotion claim depends on
01
Part 1 · The business

The value chain, the people, the trends

Part 1 maps a chain that ends before the purchase does, and names the people who plan against a signal they do not own.

The consumer goods value chain

Six stages from innovation to deduction. Select one.

Who you are building for

None of these people can see the shopper. All of them are judged on what the shopper did. Select one to light the stages they own.

What the sector is seeing

An industry rich in data it does not own, and poor in the master data that would join it.

Where these numbers come from — 4 sources

Consulted when this program was written, in July 2026. Each entry names the claim on this page that it backs, so the pairing stays checkable if the copy is later edited.

  1. BCGAI in CPG and Retail: How Winners Are Pulling Ahead220-350bps CPG and 180-360bps retailer EBIT opportunity
  2. BCGCPG and Retail Leaders Are Bullish on AI, yet Most Haven’t Scaled It75% of CPGs still piloting; 18% scaling impact
  3. McKinseyEurope’s new ecommerce agenda: how AI is resetting growth and competitionAgentic commerce resetting discovery
  4. IndustryNVIDIA State of AI in Retail and CPG 202647% using or assessing agentic AI
02
Part 2 · Data and meaning

Domains, ontology, taxonomy and governed terms

The defining architectural problem is that the most important data belongs to somebody else, arrives late, and uses hierarchies that do not match yours. Reconciliation is not preparation here; it is the product.

The data landscape

Six families, and only three of them are yours.

Product & master data

Items, packs, hierarchies, attributes and their lifecycle.

PIM, SAP material master

Shipment & order

Customer orders, shipments and invoices — the sell-in signal.

ERP, order management

Syndicated & POS

Retailer scan data, panel and market measurement — sell-out.

Market measurement providers, retailer portals

Trade & promotion

Agreements, promotional plans, accruals and funding.

TPM systems, trade agreements

Deductions

Customer deductions, claims, backup documentation and disputes.

Deduction management, AR

Supply & production

Production plans, capacity, inventory and distribution.

APS, WMS, ERP

The semantic layer

Consumer businesses fail at AI more often on master data than on modelling. If product, location and calendar do not resolve consistently, every number the agent quotes is a different number from the one the business reports.

Data domains

Six subject areas, each with the entities it holds, its critical data elements and the function accountable for it.

Product

What is sold, at every level from case to consumer unit.

ItemPackBrandCategoryAssortment
Critical data elements
GTIN; Internal item code; Pack size and unit of measure
Owned by
Master data

Location

Where things are made, held and sold.

PlantDistribution centreStoreClusterChannel
Critical data elements
Location identifier; Cluster assignment; Trading area
Owned by
Supply chain & commercial

Customer & consumer

Retail customers who buy from you, and the consumers who buy the product.

CustomerBannerConsumerLoyalty member
Critical data elements
Customer hierarchy node; Consumer identifier; Consent state
Owned by
Commercial & CRM

Demand

Forecasts, orders, shipments and point-of-sale movement.

ForecastOrderShipmentPOS movement
Critical data elements
Forecast quantity; Order quantity; Units sold
Owned by
Demand planning

Trade & price

Price lists, promotions, trade spend and the agreements behind them.

PricePromotionTrade agreementDeduction
Critical data elements
List price; Promo mechanic; Accrual rate
Owned by
Revenue growth management

Digital shelf

How the product appears and performs on retailer ecommerce.

ListingContent assetReviewSearch rank
Critical data elements
Retailer SKU; Content compliance score; Share of search
Owned by
Ecommerce

Ontology & knowledge graph

The entities and the typed relationships between them — what the agent traverses instead of guessing joins. Select any entity.

ItemBrandCategoryCustomerStoreClusterForecastOrderShipmentPOS movementPromotionListing
Core entityEventReference / classification

Taxonomies

The classification hierarchies that make records comparable across systems.

Product hierarchy

  1. Sector
  2. Category
  3. Sub-category
  4. Brand
  5. Item

Beverages → Carbonates → Cola → BrandX → 330ml can 6-pack

Customer hierarchy

  1. Global account
  2. Banner
  3. Region
  4. Store

RetailCo → RetailCo Express → South → Store 4412

Promotion mechanic

  1. Type
  2. Mechanic
  3. Depth

Price → Temporary price reduction → 20% off

Governed business terms

The definitions an agent must use rather than invent. Most wrong answers in this industry are a term used loosely.

Item vs SKU
An item is the sellable unit in your master; a retailer SKU is their identifier for it. They rarely match one to one.
Shipment vs consumption
Shipment is what you sold in to the retailer; POS is what the consumer bought. Confusing them distorts every forecast.
Baseline
Expected sales absent promotion — the counterfactual every lift calculation depends on.
Incremental lift
Promoted sales minus baseline. Uplift without a baseline is not lift.
Transferable demand
Demand that shifts to another item when one is delisted, rather than being lost.
Phantom inventory
Stock the system believes is on shelf but is not.
Share of search
Visibility in retailer search results for a term — a leading indicator of demand.
Trade spend
Investment with a customer to drive volume, accrued and settled against agreements.
03
Part 2 · The architecture

How it is actually built

The layers a deployment needs, what each one holds, and what the engineer owns there.

The reference architecture

Seven layers, with hierarchy reconciliation treated as a governed capability, not a script.

Typical tech stack

Models
  • Frontier models for agreement and backup reasoning
  • Small models for item matching at scale
  • Forecast and baseline models
Grounding
  • Trade agreement clause index
  • Deduction backup corpus
  • Claims substantiation library
Agents
  • Deduction validation agents
  • MCP over ERP and TPM
  • Distribution gap agents
Data
  • Syndicated feed ingestion
  • Hierarchy and item mapping
  • Calendar alignment
Assurance
  • Mapping coverage measurement
  • Baseline definition governance
  • Claims control
Runtime
  • Batch-oriented deployment
  • Late-arriving data handling
  • Cost per validation budgeting

Constraints that shape the design

The demand signal is not yours

Syndicated and POS data arrive on someone else’s calendar, in their hierarchy, with their revisions. Design for lateness and restatement rather than treating them as exceptions.

Hierarchy mapping is the ceiling

Every number is computed across a mapping between your items and theirs. Report its coverage, because a metric built on 70% mapping is a 70% metric however precisely it is stated.

Baselines must be agreed before they are computed

A promotional lift is a claim about a counterfactual. If commercial and finance have not agreed how the baseline is derived, the model is arguing rather than measuring.

Claims are regulated

What may be said about a product is controlled by regulatory approval. An agent that composes a plausible claim has created a compliance problem, not a marketing asset.

04
Part 3 · Getting it done

Where the business and the technology meet

These use cases divide into two groups: those that fix the data nobody owns, and those that recover money the organisation has already spent.

Use cases, mapped to the chain and the architecture

Filter by stage or by earned autonomy. Selecting a use case jumps the value chain and the architecture to the stage and layer it depends on.

Value chain stage
Autonomy earned
12 use cases

The delivery playbook

How a consumer goods deployment actually runs.

01

Week 1 — measure the mapping, publish the number

Establish item and location mapping coverage against every external source. Publish it. Every metric you deliver later is capped by it and must carry it.

02

Week 2 — get the baseline definition agreed

Commercial and finance must sign one baseline definition before anyone computes a lift. Doing this after the model exists turns measurement into negotiation.

03

Weeks 3-6 — start with deductions

Deduction validation recovers cash within a quarter, needs no forecasting maturity, and forces the agreement corpus into shape for everything that follows.

04

Weeks 7-9 — move to sell-out once mapping supports it

Distribution gaps and consumption forecasting only mean anything at adequate mapping coverage. Do not start them before the number justifies it.

05

Weeks 10-12 — claims control and handover

Prove the agent cannot assert an unapproved product claim, then hand over runbook, mapping coverage report and the agreed baseline definition.

The curriculum

8 modules, 80 taught hours, 40 hands-on labs and 8 assessments — every lab provisioned and graded by the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground. Open a module to see its labs.

01The SCDAI delivery model in consumer goodsLanding in a commercial organisation where the planner, not the executive, decides adoption.10 hrs · 5 labs
Delivery mandateSell-in vs sell-outValue sizing in bpsStakeholder mapAdoption dynamicsThin-slice scoping
01
Decision selectionScore four commercial decisions on value, cadence and data readiness.
02
Value sizingSize a forecast error, a promotion and an unrecovered deduction.
03
Master data auditAssess whether product and location masters support a use case.
04
Stakeholder mapMap planner, RGM, category, trade finance and IT.
05
Thin sliceScope a one-category, one-customer slice with a measurable outcome.
Assessment 01 — Operating model & scoping25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
02Consumer goods data foundationsYour masters, your shipments, and four sources that belong to somebody else.10 hrs · 5 labs
Product and location mastersShipment and order dataSyndicated and POS feedsTrade agreementsDeduction backupCalendar alignment
01
Master data profilingProfile a product master and quantify its defects.
02
Item matchingMatch internal items to retailer SKUs and measure coverage.
03
Syndicated ingestionIngest a syndicated feed and handle restatement correctly.
04
Calendar alignmentAlign fiscal, retail and syndicated calendars without silent error.
05
Backup ingestionIngest deduction backup across several document formats.
Assessment 02 — Consumer goods data landscape25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
03Context engineering for commercial languageHierarchies, units, packs and the arithmetic that quietly goes wrong.10 hrs · 5 labs
Hierarchy referencesUnit and pack conversionsStructured outputsUncertainty from mapping gapsRefusal on unapproved claimsContext budget
01
Hierarchy resolutionResolve an item across internal, retailer and syndicated codes.
02
Pack arithmeticConvert between case, pack and consumer unit without error.
03
Structured findingsEmit a deduction validation as a typed, validated structure.
04
Claims refusalMake the agent refuse to compose an unapproved product claim.
05
Context budgetCut context cost on a portfolio-wide validation run.
Assessment 03 — Context engineering25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
04Grounding on agreements and backupWhat was agreed, and what the customer sent to justify taking the money.10 hrs · 5 labs
Agreement clause retrievalAmendment and side-letter chainsBackup matchingProduct graph traversalCitationsRetrieval evals
01
Agreement retrievalRetrieve the operative term for a customer and period.
02
Amendment chainsResolve terms through amendments and side letters.
03
Backup matchingMatch deduction backup to the agreement clause it relies on.
04
Citation contractCite agreement, clause and date on every validation.
05
Retrieval evalsBuild an analyst-labelled clause set and measure precision.
Assessment 04 — Retrieval & grounding25 items · 40 min · pass 70%
05Commercial agent designValidation, baselines and the discipline of not concluding what the data cannot support.10 hrs · 5 labs
Workflow vs agentValidation patternsBaseline computationAmbiguity handlingCoverage reportingEscalation
01
Validation agentValidate a deduction against agreement and backup.
02
Baseline computationCompute a baseline to an agreed, documented definition.
03
Ambiguity handlingDistinguish delisting, out-of-stock and reporting lag honestly.
04
Coverage reportingAttach mapping coverage to every metric the agent emits.
05
EscalationDefine when a deduction must go to a human and prove it does.
Assessment 05 — Agent design for commercial work25 items · 40 min · pass 70%
06Integrating with ERP, TPM and portalsRead the enterprise, read the retailer, and write only into the claim.10 hrs · 5 labs
MCP over ERP and TPMPortal retrievalClaim write-backLate-arriving dataIdentityError handling
01
MCP over ERPExpose shipment, item and customer lookups as typed read tools.
02
TPM integrationRead promotional plans and accruals within their permission model.
03
Portal retrievalRetrieve retailer data reliably from a portal that changes.
04
Claim write-backRaise a dispute claim under a traceable service identity.
05
Late dataHandle a restated syndicated period without corrupting history.
Assessment 06 — Systems integration25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
07Claims, competition law and securityTwo things you may not say, and one thing you may not share.10 hrs · 5 labs
Claims substantiationRegulatory approvalCompetition-law boundariesOWASP LLM Top 10Injection via backup documentsIncident response
01
Claims controlEnforce that only approved claims may be asserted.
02
Substantiation retrievalRetrieve evidence for a claim without composing one.
03
Competition boundaryPrevent competitor-sensitive data from crossing where it must not.
04
Injection defenceDefend against instructions embedded in customer backup.
05
Red teamRun an OWASP LLM Top 10 pass over the validation pipeline.
Assessment 07 — Claims, competition & security30 items · 45 min · pass 70%
08Production, coverage and recoveryMapping coverage and cash recovered are the two numbers that survive the steering meeting.10 hrs · 5 labs
Eval suitesCoverage measurementDriftRecovery trackingCost per validationHandover
01
Eval gateGate deployment on validation accuracy regression.
02
Coverage studyMeasure and improve item mapping coverage.
03
Drift watchDetect drift after a retailer changes its hierarchy.
04
Recovery trackingMeasure cash recovered against a pre-agent baseline.
05
HandoverProduce runbook, coverage report and agreed baseline definition.
Assessment 08 — Production & outcomes30 items · 45 min · pass 70%

Two capstones — 20 hours

End-to-end agent design, development, deployment and testing, 10 hours each. Reviewed by a Senior SCDAI Engineer against a published rubric.

Capstone A — Deduction validation agent

Build an agent that validates customer deductions against the operative trade agreement and the backup supplied, citing agreement, clause and date, escalating what it cannot substantiate, and measured on cash recovered against a pre-agent baseline.

Capstone B — Baseline and lift agent

Build an agent that computes a promotional baseline to an agreed, documented definition and reports incremental lift with mapping coverage attached to every figure, so a commercial reader can see exactly how much of the category the number covers.

What you deliver, and how it is marked
  • A running agent, deployed on the program's target stack, reachable by a reviewer.
  • An architecture note: boundaries, tools, autonomy level and the trade-offs you took.
  • A versioned eval set with a baseline and your final scores.
  • A trace walkthrough of one success and one deliberate failure.
  • Cost per task, measured — not estimated.
  • A runbook and rollback path a client team could operate on Monday.
Problem fit15%Is this a decision worth automating, scoped to a defensible boundary?
Architecture20%Right pattern for the constraints; autonomy earned, not assumed.
Grounding & accuracy20%Measured groundedness against the eval set, with the failures named.
Safety & compliance20%Domain controls actually enforced, and demonstrably so.
Operability15%Traces, runbook, rollback, cost — could someone else run this?
Communication10%Can a client executive follow the reasoning in ten minutes?

One lab, start to finish

Every lab in this program follows the shape below. This is lab 07 in full — the brief you are given, the environment that is provisioned for you, the code you start from and the assertions that decide whether you passed.

Module 07 · Claims, competition law and security

Promotion lift with a real counterfactual

Measure incremental lift rather than promoted sales.

The brief

You are given two years of POS across 900 stores and a promotion calendar. Design and run a matched-store holdout, estimate the baseline, and report lift with a confidence interval. The lab includes one promotion that genuinely did not work — your method must say so.

Provisioned for you
  • POS: 900 stores x 24 months x 40 items
  • Promotion calendar with mechanics
  • Weather and competitor promo signals
  • Reference lift for 6 of 8 promotions
You start from this
def measure_lift(pos, promo, store_master):
    """Return {promo_id: (lift_pct, ci_low, ci_high, n_test, n_control)}.
    Matching happens BEFORE the promotion window, on pre-period behaviour."""
    raise NotImplementedError
What the grader asserts
  1. Control stores matched on pre-period sales, not on post-period outcome
  2. Reported lift within 2pp of the reference on all 6 known promotions
  3. The null promotion returns a confidence interval spanning zero
  4. Cannibalisation on substitute items is netted off, not ignored
  5. Method is stated well enough that a commercial manager could challenge it

Pass barAll six references within tolerance and the null promotion correctly identified as null.

StretchWrap it as a propose-and-approve agent that recommends a change and shows this evidence.

05
Assessment

Assessed, not attended

Every module ends with a timed, randomised assessment delivered through the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground. The certificate requires a pass on all of them plus two reviewed capstones.

Assessment blueprint

What each test covers, how long it runs, and how many items are currently in the versioned bank behind it.

#Assessment & coverageItemsTimeIn bank
01Operating model & scopingDelivery mandateSell-in vs sell-outValue sizingThin slicing2535 min4
02Consumer goods data landscapeMaster dataSyndicated dataCalendarsItem matching2535 min4
03Context engineeringHierarchy resolutionUnit conversionRefusalStructured outputs2535 min4
04Retrieval & groundingAgreement retrievalAmendmentsBackup matchingRetrieval metrics2540 min4
05Agent design for commercial workValidationBaselinesAmbiguityCoverage reporting2540 min4
06Systems integrationMCP designPortal retrievalWrite-back safetyLate data2535 min4
07Claims, competition & securityClaims controlSubstantiationCompetition lawLLM security3045 min4
08Production & outcomesEval gatingCoverageRecovery measurementEconomics3045 min4
Single best answerOne defensible option among plausible distractors drawn from real field mistakes.
Scenario judgementA client situation with constraints; you pick the action a Senior SCDAI Engineer would take.
Architecture selectionGiven non-functional requirements, choose the pattern and justify the trade-off.
Failure diagnosisA trace, an eval report or a cost curve — identify the root cause.
  • Each module ends with a timed assessment; the program certificate requires a pass on every one.
  • Items are drawn at random from a versioned bank, so no two learners sit an identical paper.
  • Pass mark is 70%. Two retakes are included, each with a fresh draw.
  • Scenario items carry double weight — they are the ones that predict field performance.
  • Capstones are reviewed against a published rubric by a Senior SCDAI Engineer, not auto-graded.

Try four questions from the bank

Real items, drawn from 32 in this program's bank — weighted toward the scenario and diagnosis types, because those are the ones that predict field performance. Instant feedback, nothing saved.

Four sample items — one attempt each, then the reasoning is shown.

Q1Before promising a forecasting improvement, what must you check?

Master data determines feasibility and timeline. A forecast built on unreconciled hierarchies produces confident nonsense.

Q2POS and shipment data disagree for the same week. What is the correct handling?

They measure different things at different points. Hiding the discrepancy destroys the planner’s ability to reason.

Q3A planner overrides the agent’s forecast every week. What is the most likely cause?

Explanation is the adoption feature in planning. An unexplained forecast is overridden regardless of its quality.

Q4What makes analogue selection the critical method in new-product forecasting?

Superficially similar products behave differently. Analogue selection is where the method lives or dies.

06
Career & outcomes

What this makes you, and where it goes next

The same ladder whichever specialisation you enter through — what changes is the domain you go deep in. Below: how the program is delivered, the skills it moves, the roles it leads to, and the specialisations closest to this one.

Available two ways

The same labs, assessments and capstones, delivered to an enterprise cohort or to individual professionals.

B2B

Direct to enterprise

Cohorts of 20 to 2,000+ on your own tenancy, with your data patterns and your cloud. Skill-gap baselining up front, per-team mastery reporting throughout, and capstones scoped against your real backlog so the output is deployable work.

  • Private cohort on your tenancy
  • Baseline skills assessment before kick-off
  • Capstones scoped to your backlog
  • Per-team mastery dashboards for L&D
  • Optional Senior SCDAI Engineer architecture reviews
B2C

Direct to individual professionals

The same labs, assessments and capstones for individual engineers and analysts, run on shared infrastructure with a fixed cohort calendar. You leave with a graded portfolio, not a certificate of attendance.

  • Fixed-date cohorts, self-paced within them
  • Same graded labs and item bank
  • Portfolio-ready capstones you own
  • Certificate on a pass in every module
  • Community and office-hours access

Skill matrix

Find your row and aim one column right. The Playground scores you against this after every module.

SkillBeginnerIntermediateAdvanced
Consumer goods fluencyKnows the trade terms.Separates sell-in from sell-out in every metric.Sizes trade spend and recovery value credibly.
Master data engineeringReads a product master.Maps items across internal, retailer and syndicated codes.Runs mapping with coverage published on every metric.
Commercial measurementComputes a lift.Computes it to an agreed baseline definition.Governs baseline definitions across commercial and finance.
Context engineeringWrites clear prompts.Structures retrieval, tools and state deliberately.Designs context strategy for reliability and cost at scale.
Retrieval & groundingBuilds basic vector search.Tunes chunking, hybrid search and reranking.Designs graph + vector grounding with measured recall.
Agent orchestrationRuns a single tool-calling agent.Builds supervised multi-step and multi-agent flows.Designs autonomy boundaries and failure containment.
Tool & system integrationCalls a documented API.Writes an MCP server over a system of record.Designs a least-privilege tool estate across systems.
EvaluationEyeballs outputs.Builds labelled eval sets and regression gates.Runs online evals with drift and judge calibration.
Observability & costReads logs.Traces runs, tracks tokens and latency.Owns cost per task and capacity planning in production.
Security & guardrailsAdds output filters.Mitigates the OWASP LLM Top 10 in a build.Threat-models an agent estate and proves controls.
Client deliveryTakes notes in a workshop.Runs discovery and scopes a thin slice.Owns the account technically, from scope to handover.

Where it takes you

The SCDAI ladder is the same whichever specialisation you enter through — what changes is the domain you go deep in.

01
Data and AI EngineerEntry
Python, LLM APIs, first RAG build, prompt and context basics.
02
Associate Data and AI EngineerPractitioner
Client-facing discovery, tool integration, agent build under supervision.
03
SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI EngineerSpecialist
Owns a deployment end to end — scoping, build, evals, handover.
04
Senior Data and AI Engineer / Domain LeadSenior
Multi-agent architecture, regulated deployments, reference patterns for the practice.
05
AI Architect / Practice LeadLeadership
Portfolio of accounts, delivery standards, hiring and capability strategy.
Terms worth knowing
Sell-in
What you shipped to the retailer — your order data, not demand.
Sell-out
What the shopper bought from the retailer — consumption, and the real signal.
Baseline
Expected sales absent promotion; the counterfactual every lift calculation needs.
Incremental lift
Promoted sales minus baseline. Uplift without a baseline is not lift.
Trade spend
Investment with a customer to drive volume, accrued and settled against agreements.
Deduction
Money a customer withholds from an invoice, valid or otherwise.
Syndicated data
Market measurement bought from a third party, in their hierarchy and calendar.
Rate of sale
Units sold per store per week — the comparable that survives store-count change.
SCDAI
SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI Engineer — the credential this program awards.
SCDAI engineer
An engineer embedded with the customer who turns their constraints into a working system.
Thin slice
The narrowest end-to-end path through a workflow that still produces business value.
Agentic RAG
Retrieval where the agent decides when, what and how often to retrieve.
MCP
Model Context Protocol — open standard connecting an agent to tools and data.
A2A
Agent2Agent — protocol for agent-to-agent delegation across vendors.
Eval set
A labelled, versioned set of cases an agent must pass before release.
LLM-as-judge
Using a model to score outputs, calibrated periodically against human ratings.
Guardrail
An enforced constraint on an input, output or action — not a prompt request.
Human-in-the-loop
A required human approval step before a consequential action executes.
Cost per task
Total token, tool and compute cost of one completed unit of work — the engineer's unit economic.
Golden path
The reference architecture a practice standardises on so deployments stay reviewable.
Handover
The point at which the client can operate, evaluate and change the system without the engineer.

Related programs

Skill a team, or join a cohort

B2B cohorts run on your tenancy with capstones scoped to your backlog. B2C cohorts run on a fixed calendar.

Talk to us
07
Enrolling

What you need, what you get, and what it costs

Stated plainly enough to rule yourself in or out without a sales call: the prerequisites, how the program runs, exactly what the credential is worth, and the questions everyone asks.

Before you start

Stated plainly so you can rule yourself in or out without a sales call. Nothing here is a formal qualification — it is what the first lab assumes you can already do.

Technical

You should already be able to do these

  • Comfortable in Python: functions, typing, virtual environments, reading a stack trace
  • Have called an LLM API and handled a structured response
  • Git, the command line, and reading someone else’s code without panic

Domain

What we assume, and what we teach

  • Basic commercial literacy: what a promotion, a forecast and an assortment are
  • Comfort with tabular data and simple statistics

Time and access

What the program asks of your week

  • A machine that can run a browser and a terminal — labs run in the Playground, not locally
  • Roughly 8 hours a week for the taught weeks, plus 20 hours for the two capstones

How it runs

Cohort dates and pricing are confirmed on enquiry rather than printed here, because both move with the intake.

Format
Self-paced within a fixed cohort window, delivered in the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground
Taught hours
80 hours across 8 modules
Capstones
20 hours — two end-to-end builds, reviewed not auto-graded
Typical duration
10–12 weeks at around 8 hours a week
Level
Intermediate → Advanced
Built for
Engineers and analysts deploying AI at consumer goods manufacturers
Next cohorts
— confirmed on enquiry
Pricing
— confirmed on enquiry

The credential

The credential is awarded per specialisation, so it names the domain or stack you were assessed in rather than claiming general competence. On this program the badge reads SCDAI — FMCG & CPG.

How it is earned

  • A pass at 70% or above on every module assessment — not an average across them
  • Both capstones reviewed against the published rubric by a Senior SCDAI Engineer
  • All labs submitted and machine-graded green
Awarded as
A verifiable digital badge with a public credential record
Valid for
Two years from award
Recertification
One current-year assessment plus a refreshed capstone
Retakes
Two included per assessment, each with a fresh item draw
Named specialisation
The badge states the domain or stack, e.g. SCDAI — Healthcare
Verification
Third parties confirm a holder from the credential record, no login required

A certificate that cannot be checked is decoration. Every award resolves to a record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

The certificate you leave with

This is the credential the program awards, shown exactly as it is issued — with the specialisation named, the assessment record attached and a verification link anyone can check without an account.

SCIKIQ Data Academy Certificate of Professional Certification

This is to certify that

Your name

has been assessed and certified as

SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI Engineer

FMCG & CPG

Specialisation
FMCG & CPG
Assessments passed
8 of 8, each at 70% or above
Labs graded
40 of 40 machine-graded green
Capstones reviewed
2, against the published rubric
Taught hours
80 across 8 modules, plus 20 capstone hours
AwardedOn completion
Valid untilTwo years from award
Credential IDSCDAI-FMCG-CPG-<issued>
Senior SCDAI Engineer, Certification Board
  1. 01
    The specialisation is on the certificate

    Not “Data and AI Engineer” but the domain or stack you were actually assessed in. A general claim would be a weaker one.

  2. 02
    The assessment record travels with it

    Modules passed, labs graded and both capstones reviewed — so the credential states what was measured rather than that you attended.

  3. 03
    Anyone can verify it, without a login

    The credential ID resolves to a public record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

Share it on LinkedIn

Add it to your LinkedIn profile in one step. The link pre-fills the certification fields from the credential record, so the entry on your profile matches the record a reader can check.

Add to LinkedIn profile The button is live on your real certificate; here it opens LinkedIn pre-filled with this specialisation so you can see exactly what the profile entry will say.

A certificate that cannot be checked is decoration. Every award resolves to a record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

Questions we get asked

The objections that come up in every conversation about this program, answered without the brochure voice.

Is this a course or a certification?

Both, and the second is the point. Eight timed assessments and two reviewed capstones stand between you and the credential, so a pass means someone measured the skill rather than recorded your attendance.

How is it self-paced without falling apart?

Every lab is provisioned, graded and unblocked by the Playground rather than by an instructor. That is what lets a cohort of 2,000 cost the same faculty time as a cohort of 20 — and why you are never waiting on someone to mark your work.

What if I fail an assessment?

Two retakes are included per assessment, each drawing a fresh item set from the bank, so a retake is a genuinely new paper rather than the same questions again.

Do I need my own cloud account?

For the domain specialisations, no — labs run in provisioned sandboxes. For the four tech-stack programs you will want access to that platform, since deploying into a real subscription is much of the point.

Can we run this privately for our team?

Yes. B2B cohorts run on your own tenancy with your data patterns, a skills baseline before kick-off, per-team mastery reporting, and capstones scoped against your actual backlog so the output is deployable work rather than an exercise.

Which specialisation should I take?

Take the domain you deploy into. If you move across industries, take a tech-stack program instead and pick up domain context on the engagement. The chooser on the programs page will narrow it.

How current is the material?

The trends, platform capabilities and regulatory positions are reviewed each quarter, and every external claim on these pages links to its source so you can check the date yourself.

What do I actually leave with?

A graded portfolio: forty machine-graded labs, two reviewed end-to-end agent builds with measured evaluation and cost per task, and a verifiable credential naming your specialisation.

Still deciding?

Tell us the systems you deploy into and we will say plainly whether this specialisation is the right one — or which of the 21 is.

Talk to us