Program 08 · Domain specialisation

SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI EngineerRetail

Retail is the one consumer business that owns the shelf, the stock on it and the person standing next to it. That makes the data unusually direct — you see the actual purchase — and the constraints unusually physical. A recommendation the store cannot execute, because the stock is not there or nobody is rostered to do it, is not a recommendation.

  • 80 hrstaught
  • 40hands-on AI labs
  • 8assessment tests
  • +20 hrs2 E2E capstones
Phantom inventoryStock the system believes is on shelf and is not
AvailabilityThe lost sale nobody records, because it never happened
Markdown timingMargin decided weeks before anyone marks anything down
Store labourThe constraint that decides whether any plan is executable
01
Part 1 · The business

The value chain, the people, the trends

Part 1 follows a product from the buying decision to the shelf and, sometimes, back again. It names the people who make each of those calls.

The retail value chain

Six stages from range to returns. Select one.

Who you are building for

The store manager is the person every central decision eventually lands on. Select one to light the stages they own.

What the sector is seeing

A business with excellent transaction data and a persistent gap between system and shelf.

02
Part 2 · Data and meaning

Domains, ontology, taxonomy and governed terms

The defining problem is the gap between the inventory record and the shelf. Almost every retail use case is either exploiting good transaction data or compensating for that gap.

The data landscape

Six families. The second one is the one that lies to you.

Transactions

Line-level sales, baskets, tenders, returns and refunds.

POS, transaction log

Inventory

Stock by item and location, movements, counts and adjustments.

Inventory systems, RFID, counts

Product & range

Items, hierarchy, attributes, assortment and store clustering.

Merchandising systems, PIM

Price & promotion

Prices, markdowns, promotional mechanics and competitor prices.

Pricing systems, competitor feeds

Store & labour

Rosters, tasks, completion, compliance and store attributes.

Workforce management, task systems

Customer & loyalty

Identified customers, loyalty, consent and interaction history.

Loyalty platform, CRM

The semantic layer

A retail agent that treats the stock figure as a measurement rather than as a record will recommend confidently and wrongly, every day, on exactly the items that are selling. These are the domains, the graph and the definitions it must be grounded on.

Data domains

Six subject areas, each with the entities it holds, its critical data elements and the function accountable for it.

Product & range

What is sold, and where it is ranged.

ItemVariantCategoryAssortment
Critical data elements
Item code; Barcode; Category node
Owned by
Merchandising

Location

Where it is sold, and which locations behave alike.

StoreClusterRegionZone
Critical data elements
Store identifier; Cluster assignment; Trading area
Owned by
Store operations

Inventory

What the system believes is where, and how it got there.

Stock positionMovementAdjustmentCount
Critical data elements
On-hand quantity; Movement type; Last count date
Owned by
Supply chain

Trade & price

What it costs and what it is being sold for.

PriceMarkdownPromotionSupplier term
Critical data elements
Retail price; Markdown depth; Promotion mechanic
Owned by
Trading

Transaction

What the shopper actually bought or brought back.

TransactionBasketLineReturn
Critical data elements
Units sold; Transaction timestamp; Tender type
Owned by
Retail operations

Labour & task

Who is available and what they were asked to do.

RosterShiftTaskCompletion
Critical data elements
Rostered hours; Task type; Completion status
Owned by
Store operations

Ontology & knowledge graph

The entities and the typed relationships between them — what the agent traverses instead of guessing joins. Select any entity.

ItemCategoryStoreClusterStock positionMovementTransactionReturnPricePromotionTaskRoster
Core entityEventReference / classification

Taxonomies

The classification hierarchies that make records comparable across systems.

Product hierarchy

  1. Division
  2. Category
  3. Sub-category
  4. Item

Grocery → Dairy → Yoghurt → 4-pack strawberry

Store clustering

  1. Region
  2. Format
  3. Cluster

South → Convenience → High-footfall commuter

Shrink cause

  1. Class
  2. Cause
  3. Addressable

Process → Mis-scan at till → Addressable by training

Governed business terms

The definitions an agent must use rather than invent. Most wrong answers in this industry are a term used loosely.

Stock position vs on-shelf
The stock position is a record; on-shelf is what a shopper can pick up. They diverge continuously and the divergence is the domain problem.
Phantom inventory
Stock the system believes is on shelf and which is not, suppressing replenishment silently.
On-shelf availability
The measure that reflects lost sales, as distinct from system availability which does not.
Transferable demand
Demand that moves to another item on delisting, rather than being lost.
Sell-through
The share of bought stock sold within a period; the input to markdown timing.
Store cluster
A behavioural grouping of stores, used instead of a static grade.
Rostered hours
The labour actually available, and therefore the bound on what any plan can ask for.
Shrink
Inventory lost to theft, damage or process error, usually quantified only at count.
03
Part 2 · The architecture

How it is actually built

The layers a deployment needs, what each one holds, and what the engineer owns there.

The reference architecture

Seven layers, with the inventory-truth problem addressed explicitly rather than assumed away.

Typical tech stack

Models
  • Frontier models for agreement and policy reasoning
  • Small models at transaction volume
  • Demand and markdown models
Grounding
  • Supplier agreement index
  • Store policy and procedure corpus
  • Range review history
Agents
  • Phantom detection agents
  • MCP over inventory and task systems
  • Markdown timing agents
Data
  • Transaction ingestion at store volume
  • Movement reconciliation
  • Store clustering
Assurance
  • Phantom precision measurement
  • Fairness testing on loss analytics
  • Availability measurement
Runtime
  • Store-edge tolerance
  • Overnight batch windows
  • Cost per store budgeting

Constraints that shape the design

The inventory record is not the shelf

Stock figures drift from reality through theft, damage, mis-scans and misplacement. Any system that treats the record as truth will silently suppress replenishment on exactly the items that are selling.

Labour bounds executability

A store has a fixed number of rostered hours. Task generation that ignores them produces a plan that is silently triaged by whoever is on shift, and you will not know which parts survived.

Loss analytics touches people

Shrink and return models implicate staff and customers. Proportionality, explainability and pointing at process before individuals are design requirements.

Volume is high and margins are thin

Per-transaction inference is not affordable at retail scale. Reserve reasoning for decisions, not for records.

04
Part 3 · Getting it done

Where the business and the technology meet

The most valuable use cases here are the ones that stop trusting a number the whole business has been trusting for decades.

Use cases, mapped to the chain and the architecture

Filter by stage or by earned autonomy. Selecting a use case jumps the value chain and the architecture to the stage and layer it depends on.

Value chain stage
Autonomy earned
12 use cases

The delivery playbook

How a retail deployment actually runs.

01

Week 1 — find out how wrong the stock figure is

Measure inventory record accuracy against physical reality on a sample. Every replenishment and availability use case is capped by this number.

02

Week 2 — agree what availability means

Supply chain and stores must agree one definition, including whether it is measured in the system or on the shelf. They usually mean different things by it.

03

Weeks 3-6 — start with phantom detection

It needs only transaction data, recovers sales nobody knew were lost, and produces the inventory confidence every later use case depends on.

04

Weeks 7-9 — take on tasks only with roster data

Do not generate store tasks until you have rostered hours. Without them you are adding to a queue that is already being triaged without you.

05

Weeks 10-12 — fairness, availability proof and handover

Test loss analytics for disparity, prove on-shelf availability actually moved, then hand over runbook, thresholds and the definitions agreed in week two.

The curriculum

8 modules, 80 taught hours, 40 hands-on labs and 8 assessments — every lab provisioned and graded by the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground. Open a module to see its labs.

01The SCDAI delivery model in retailLanding in a business where the store, not the head office, decides what actually happens.10 hrs · 5 labs
Delivery mandateSystem vs shelfValue sizing on availability and marginStakeholder mapStore adoptionThin-slice scoping
01
Decision selectionScore four retail decisions on value, cadence and data readiness.
02
Value sizingSize a lost sale, a late markdown and a point of shrink.
03
Inventory accuracy auditMeasure stock record accuracy against a physical sample.
04
Stakeholder mapMap buying, pricing, replenishment, stores and loss prevention.
05
Thin sliceScope a one-category, one-cluster slice with a measurable outcome.
Assessment 01 — Operating model & scoping25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
02Retail data foundationsTransactions you can trust, inventory you cannot, and the labour data nobody shares.10 hrs · 5 labs
Transaction data at volumeInventory movements and adjustmentsRange and clusteringPrice and promotion dataRoster and task dataLoyalty and consent
01
Transaction ingestionIngest line-level transactions within a cost budget.
02
Movement reconciliationReconcile stock movements and find where the record breaks.
03
Store clusteringBuild store clusters from demand behaviour rather than from grade.
04
Roster ingestionIngest rostered hours and model available task capacity.
05
Consent handlingApply loyalty consent state at the point of retrieval.
Assessment 02 — Retail data landscape25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
03Context engineering for retail languageItem codes, store codes, units and the arithmetic of packs and cases.10 hrs · 5 labs
Item and store resolutionUnit and pack handlingStructured outputsConfidence on inferred stockRefusal on individual attributionContext budget
01
Item resolutionResolve items across supplier, internal and barcode identifiers.
02
Pack arithmeticConvert case, pack and unit without silent error.
03
Structured findingsEmit a phantom finding with confidence as a typed structure.
04
Attribution refusalMake the agent refuse to attribute shrink to an individual.
05
Context budgetCut context cost on a chain-wide nightly run.
Assessment 03 — Context engineering25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
04Grounding on agreements and store policyWhat the supplier owes, and what the store is actually allowed to do.10 hrs · 5 labs
Supplier agreement retrievalPolicy and procedure retrievalRange review historyProduct graph traversalCitationsRetrieval evals
01
Agreement retrievalRetrieve the operative supplier term for an item and period.
02
Policy retrievalAnswer a store-procedure question with the policy cited.
03
Range historyRetrieve what happened last time this item was delisted.
04
Citation contractCite agreement or policy and date on every recommendation.
05
Retrieval evalsBuild a buyer-labelled question set and measure precision.
Assessment 04 — Retrieval & grounding25 items · 40 min · pass 70%
05Retail agent designDetecting what the record hides, and generating work that can actually be done.10 hrs · 5 labs
Workflow vs agentPhantom detection patternsConfidence propagationCapacity-bounded task generationFairness in loss analyticsEscalation
01
Phantom agentDetect phantom inventory from transaction gap patterns.
02
Confidence propagationCarry stock confidence through into replenishment output.
03
Capacity-bounded tasksGenerate a task list that fits the rostered hours.
04
Fairness designDesign shrink analytics that point at process before people.
05
EscalationDefine when a loss finding requires human review and prove it does.
Assessment 05 — Agent design for retail25 items · 40 min · pass 70%
06Integrating with inventory, pricing and task systemsRead the chain, write to the task list, and never straight to the price.10 hrs · 5 labs
MCP over inventory and pricingTask system write-backBatch windowsStore-edge toleranceIdentityError handling
01
MCP over inventoryExpose stock, movement and range lookups as typed read tools.
02
Task write-backCreate store tasks under a traceable service identity.
03
Batch windowsFit a chain-wide run inside the overnight window.
04
Store edgeHandle a store that loses connectivity during the trading day.
05
IdentityBind agent access to banner, region and role entitlements.
Assessment 06 — Systems integration25 items · 35 min · pass 70%
07Fairness, privacy and securityLoss analytics and staff monitoring are where retail AI causes real harm.10 hrs · 5 labs
Fairness testingProportionalityStaff monitoring limitsCustomer consentOWASP LLM Top 10Incident response
01
Fairness testingTest shrink analytics for systematic disparity across stores and staff.
02
Proportionality reviewAssess whether a monitoring design is proportionate to the loss.
03
Consent enforcementApply loyalty consent inside retrieval, not at send time.
04
Injection defenceDefend against instructions embedded in supplier content.
05
Red teamRun an OWASP LLM Top 10 pass over the loss pipeline.
Assessment 07 — Fairness, privacy & security30 items · 45 min · pass 70%
08Production, availability and cost per storeOn-shelf availability is the number. A dashboard that moved without it is a failure.10 hrs · 5 labs
Eval suitesAvailability measurementDriftPhantom precisionCost per storeHandover
01
Eval gateGate deployment on phantom precision regression.
02
Availability studyMeasure on-shelf availability before and after, on the shelf.
03
Drift watchDetect drift after a range change or a store refit.
04
Cost per storeMeasure and reduce cost per store across the estate.
05
HandoverProduce runbook, thresholds and the agreed availability definition.
Assessment 08 — Production & outcomes30 items · 45 min · pass 70%

Two capstones — 20 hours

End-to-end agent design, development, deployment and testing, 10 hours each. Reviewed by a Senior SCDAI Engineer against a published rubric.

Capstone A — Phantom inventory agent

Build an agent that detects items the inventory record shows on shelf but which have stopped selling abnormally, distinguishes them from genuine slow sellers, propagates a confidence into the replenishment output, and is measured on precision against a physically counted set.

Capstone B — Executable task agent

Build an agent that generates a store’s daily task list bounded by actual rostered hours, prioritised by measured sales impact, citing the store policy governing each task — and demonstrably never issuing more work than the roster supports.

What you deliver, and how it is marked
  • A running agent, deployed on the program's target stack, reachable by a reviewer.
  • An architecture note: boundaries, tools, autonomy level and the trade-offs you took.
  • A versioned eval set with a baseline and your final scores.
  • A trace walkthrough of one success and one deliberate failure.
  • Cost per task, measured — not estimated.
  • A runbook and rollback path a client team could operate on Monday.
Problem fit15%Is this a decision worth automating, scoped to a defensible boundary?
Architecture20%Right pattern for the constraints; autonomy earned, not assumed.
Grounding & accuracy20%Measured groundedness against the eval set, with the failures named.
Safety & compliance20%Domain controls actually enforced, and demonstrably so.
Operability15%Traces, runbook, rollback, cost — could someone else run this?
Communication10%Can a client executive follow the reasoning in ten minutes?

One lab, start to finish

Every lab in this program follows the shape below. This is lab 05 in full — the brief you are given, the environment that is provisioned for you, the code you start from and the assertions that decide whether you passed.

Module 05 · Retail agent design

Finding stock that is not there

Detect phantom inventory from sales behaviour, without flagging every slow seller.

The brief

You are given 12 weeks of line-level sales, the stock record and the movement history for 40,000 item-store combinations, plus a physically counted set. Some items stopped selling because they are not physically on the shelf; most stopped because nobody wanted them. Return the phantoms, with a confidence, and propagate that confidence into the replenishment signal.

Provisioned for you
  • 40,000 item-store combinations, 12 weeks of sales
  • Stock record and movement history
  • Physically counted validation set (1,200 combinations)
  • Replenishment interface stub
You start from this
def detect_phantoms(sales, stock, movements):
    """Return [(item, store, confidence, evidence)] for suspected phantoms.

    A slow seller and a phantom look identical in a stock figure. The
    difference is in the SHAPE of the sales stop, against that item's own
    prior rate of sale at that store.
    """
    # 1. baseline rate of sale per item-store, not per item
    # 2. a phantom is an abrupt stop while stock is still recorded positive
    # 3. never return a bare flag -- return the evidence that produced it
    raise NotImplementedError
What the grader asserts
  1. Precision at or above 0.7 against the physically counted set
  2. Slow sellers with a declining but continuous curve are not flagged as phantoms
  3. Baseline is computed per item-store, not per item across the chain
  4. Every flag carries the evidence and a confidence, never a bare boolean
  5. The replenishment signal receives the confidence, not a corrected stock figure

Pass barPrecision at or above 0.7 with fewer than 3% of combinations flagged. A high-recall run that floods the store with checks fails, because nobody will action it twice.

StretchAdd the reverse case: detect stock that is physically present but recorded as zero, which suppresses selling just as effectively and is never counted as a loss.

05
Assessment

Assessed, not attended

Every module ends with a timed, randomised assessment delivered through the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground. The certificate requires a pass on all of them plus two reviewed capstones.

Assessment blueprint

What each test covers, how long it runs, and how many items are currently in the versioned bank behind it.

#Assessment & coverageItemsTimeIn bank
01Operating model & scopingDelivery mandateSystem vs shelfValue sizingThin slicing2535 min3
02Retail data landscapeTransactionsInventory movementsClusteringLabour data2535 min2
03Context engineeringIdentifier resolutionPack arithmeticConfidenceRefusal2535 min2
04Retrieval & groundingAgreement retrievalPolicy retrievalRange historyRetrieval metrics2540 min2
05Agent design for retailPhantom detectionConfidenceCapacity boundingFairness2540 min2
06Systems integrationMCP designWrite-back safetyBatch windowsIdentity2535 min2
07Fairness, privacy & securityFairnessProportionalityConsentLLM security3045 min2
08Production & outcomesEval gatingAvailabilityPhantom precisionEconomics3045 min2
Single best answerOne defensible option among plausible distractors drawn from real field mistakes.
Scenario judgementA client situation with constraints; you pick the action a Senior SCDAI Engineer would take.
Architecture selectionGiven non-functional requirements, choose the pattern and justify the trade-off.
Failure diagnosisA trace, an eval report or a cost curve — identify the root cause.
  • Each module ends with a timed assessment; the program certificate requires a pass on every one.
  • Items are drawn at random from a versioned bank, so no two learners sit an identical paper.
  • Pass mark is 70%. Two retakes are included, each with a fresh draw.
  • Scenario items carry double weight — they are the ones that predict field performance.
  • Capstones are reviewed against a published rubric by a Senior SCDAI Engineer, not auto-graded.

Try four questions from the bank

Real items, drawn from 17 in this program's bank — weighted toward the scenario and diagnosis types, because those are the ones that predict field performance. Instant feedback, nothing saved.

Four sample items — one attempt each, then the reasoning is shown.

Q1A retailer asks for AI to improve availability. What do you measure in week one?

Every availability and replenishment use case is capped by inventory record accuracy. Measuring it first sets an honest ceiling instead of a later surprise.

Q2Should a rate-of-sale baseline be computed per item or per item-store?

A chain-level baseline flags every slow store as anomalous and misses genuine stops in fast ones. The baseline has to be local to be meaningful.

Q3Why should an agent refuse to attribute shrink to a named individual?

Shrink patterns have many innocent explanations. Attribution is an HR process with its own standards, and an agent that pre-empts it causes real harm.

Q4A phantom model achieves high recall by flagging 15% of item-store combinations. Is this useful?

The constraint is store labour. A model tuned for recall against a workforce that can check twenty items a day produces nothing but noise.

06
Career & outcomes

What this makes you, and where it goes next

The same ladder whichever specialisation you enter through — what changes is the domain you go deep in. Below: how the program is delivered, the skills it moves, the roles it leads to, and the specialisations closest to this one.

Available two ways

The same labs, assessments and capstones, delivered to an enterprise cohort or to individual professionals.

B2B

Direct to enterprise

Cohorts of 20 to 2,000+ on your own tenancy, with your data patterns and your cloud. Skill-gap baselining up front, per-team mastery reporting throughout, and capstones scoped against your real backlog so the output is deployable work.

  • Private cohort on your tenancy
  • Baseline skills assessment before kick-off
  • Capstones scoped to your backlog
  • Per-team mastery dashboards for L&D
  • Optional Senior SCDAI Engineer architecture reviews
B2C

Direct to individual professionals

The same labs, assessments and capstones for individual engineers and analysts, run on shared infrastructure with a fixed cohort calendar. You leave with a graded portfolio, not a certificate of attendance.

  • Fixed-date cohorts, self-paced within them
  • Same graded labs and item bank
  • Portfolio-ready capstones you own
  • Certificate on a pass in every module
  • Community and office-hours access

Skill matrix

Find your row and aim one column right. The Playground scores you against this after every module.

SkillBeginnerIntermediateAdvanced
Retail domain fluencyKnows the functions.Maps range, price and stock decisions to margin.Sizes availability, markdown and shrink value credibly.
Inventory truthReads a stock figure.Detects where the record and the shelf diverge.Propagates stock confidence through every downstream decision.
Executable operationsGenerates a task.Bounds task generation by rostered capacity.Proves plans were executed rather than silently triaged.
Context engineeringWrites clear prompts.Structures retrieval, tools and state deliberately.Designs context strategy for reliability and cost at scale.
Retrieval & groundingBuilds basic vector search.Tunes chunking, hybrid search and reranking.Designs graph + vector grounding with measured recall.
Agent orchestrationRuns a single tool-calling agent.Builds supervised multi-step and multi-agent flows.Designs autonomy boundaries and failure containment.
Tool & system integrationCalls a documented API.Writes an MCP server over a system of record.Designs a least-privilege tool estate across systems.
EvaluationEyeballs outputs.Builds labelled eval sets and regression gates.Runs online evals with drift and judge calibration.
Observability & costReads logs.Traces runs, tracks tokens and latency.Owns cost per task and capacity planning in production.
Security & guardrailsAdds output filters.Mitigates the OWASP LLM Top 10 in a build.Threat-models an agent estate and proves controls.
Client deliveryTakes notes in a workshop.Runs discovery and scopes a thin slice.Owns the account technically, from scope to handover.

Where it takes you

The SCDAI ladder is the same whichever specialisation you enter through — what changes is the domain you go deep in.

01
Data and AI EngineerEntry
Python, LLM APIs, first RAG build, prompt and context basics.
02
Associate Data and AI EngineerPractitioner
Client-facing discovery, tool integration, agent build under supervision.
03
SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI EngineerSpecialist
Owns a deployment end to end — scoping, build, evals, handover.
04
Senior Data and AI Engineer / Domain LeadSenior
Multi-agent architecture, regulated deployments, reference patterns for the practice.
05
AI Architect / Practice LeadLeadership
Portfolio of accounts, delivery standards, hiring and capability strategy.
Terms worth knowing
Phantom inventory
Stock the system believes is on shelf but which is not there.
On-shelf availability
What the shopper can actually pick up, as distinct from the system figure.
Transferable demand
Demand that moves to another item when one is delisted, rather than being lost.
Sell-through
The share of bought stock sold within a period; the input to markdown timing.
Store cluster
A grouping of stores that behave alike, used instead of a static grade.
Shrink
Inventory lost to theft, damage or error, usually measured only at count.
Markdown
A permanent price reduction to clear stock; timing decides most of its cost.
Rate of sale
Units sold per store per week, the comparable across different store counts.
SCDAI
SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI Engineer — the credential this program awards.
SCDAI engineer
An engineer embedded with the customer who turns their constraints into a working system.
Thin slice
The narrowest end-to-end path through a workflow that still produces business value.
Agentic RAG
Retrieval where the agent decides when, what and how often to retrieve.
MCP
Model Context Protocol — open standard connecting an agent to tools and data.
A2A
Agent2Agent — protocol for agent-to-agent delegation across vendors.
Eval set
A labelled, versioned set of cases an agent must pass before release.
LLM-as-judge
Using a model to score outputs, calibrated periodically against human ratings.
Guardrail
An enforced constraint on an input, output or action — not a prompt request.
Human-in-the-loop
A required human approval step before a consequential action executes.
Cost per task
Total token, tool and compute cost of one completed unit of work — the engineer's unit economic.
Golden path
The reference architecture a practice standardises on so deployments stay reviewable.
Handover
The point at which the client can operate, evaluate and change the system without the engineer.

Related programs

Skill a team, or join a cohort

B2B cohorts run on your tenancy with capstones scoped to your backlog. B2C cohorts run on a fixed calendar.

Talk to us
07
Enrolling

What you need, what you get, and what it costs

Stated plainly enough to rule yourself in or out without a sales call: the prerequisites, how the program runs, exactly what the credential is worth, and the questions everyone asks.

Before you start

Stated plainly so you can rule yourself in or out without a sales call. Nothing here is a formal qualification — it is what the first lab assumes you can already do.

Technical

You should already be able to do these

  • Comfortable in Python: functions, typing, virtual environments, reading a stack trace
  • Have called an LLM API and handled a structured response
  • Git, the command line, and reading someone else’s code without panic

Domain

What we assume, and what we teach

  • Basic commercial literacy: what range, markdown and replenishment mean
  • Comfort with the idea that the inventory record is frequently wrong

Time and access

What the program asks of your week

  • A machine that can run a browser and a terminal — labs run in the Playground, not locally
  • Roughly 8 hours a week for the taught weeks, plus 20 hours for the two capstones

How it runs

Cohort dates and pricing are confirmed on enquiry rather than printed here, because both move with the intake.

Format
Self-paced within a fixed cohort window, delivered in the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground
Taught hours
80 hours across 8 modules
Capstones
20 hours — two end-to-end builds, reviewed not auto-graded
Typical duration
10–12 weeks at around 8 hours a week
Level
Intermediate → Advanced
Built for
Engineers and analysts deploying AI across retail merchandising and store operations
Next cohorts
— confirmed on enquiry
Pricing
— confirmed on enquiry

The credential

The credential is awarded per specialisation, so it names the domain or stack you were assessed in rather than claiming general competence. On this program the badge reads SCDAI — Retail.

How it is earned

  • A pass at 70% or above on every module assessment — not an average across them
  • Both capstones reviewed against the published rubric by a Senior SCDAI Engineer
  • All labs submitted and machine-graded green
Awarded as
A verifiable digital badge with a public credential record
Valid for
Two years from award
Recertification
One current-year assessment plus a refreshed capstone
Retakes
Two included per assessment, each with a fresh item draw
Named specialisation
The badge states the domain or stack, e.g. SCDAI — Healthcare
Verification
Third parties confirm a holder from the credential record, no login required

A certificate that cannot be checked is decoration. Every award resolves to a record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

The certificate you leave with

This is the credential the program awards, shown exactly as it is issued — with the specialisation named, the assessment record attached and a verification link anyone can check without an account.

SCIKIQ Data Academy Certificate of Professional Certification

This is to certify that

Your name

has been assessed and certified as

SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI Engineer

Retail

Specialisation
Retail
Assessments passed
8 of 8, each at 70% or above
Labs graded
40 of 40 machine-graded green
Capstones reviewed
2, against the published rubric
Taught hours
80 across 8 modules, plus 20 capstone hours
AwardedOn completion
Valid untilTwo years from award
Credential IDSCDAI-RETAIL-<issued>
Senior SCDAI Engineer, Certification Board
  1. 01
    The specialisation is on the certificate

    Not “Data and AI Engineer” but the domain or stack you were actually assessed in. A general claim would be a weaker one.

  2. 02
    The assessment record travels with it

    Modules passed, labs graded and both capstones reviewed — so the credential states what was measured rather than that you attended.

  3. 03
    Anyone can verify it, without a login

    The credential ID resolves to a public record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

Share it on LinkedIn

Add it to your LinkedIn profile in one step. The link pre-fills the certification fields from the credential record, so the entry on your profile matches the record a reader can check.

Add to LinkedIn profile The button is live on your real certificate; here it opens LinkedIn pre-filled with this specialisation so you can see exactly what the profile entry will say.

A certificate that cannot be checked is decoration. Every award resolves to a record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

Questions we get asked

The objections that come up in every conversation about this program, answered without the brochure voice.

Is this a course or a certification?

Both, and the second is the point. Eight timed assessments and two reviewed capstones stand between you and the credential, so a pass means someone measured the skill rather than recorded your attendance.

How is it self-paced without falling apart?

Every lab is provisioned, graded and unblocked by the Playground rather than by an instructor. That is what lets a cohort of 2,000 cost the same faculty time as a cohort of 20 — and why you are never waiting on someone to mark your work.

What if I fail an assessment?

Two retakes are included per assessment, each drawing a fresh item set from the bank, so a retake is a genuinely new paper rather than the same questions again.

Do I need my own cloud account?

For the domain specialisations, no — labs run in provisioned sandboxes. For the four tech-stack programs you will want access to that platform, since deploying into a real subscription is much of the point.

Can we run this privately for our team?

Yes. B2B cohorts run on your own tenancy with your data patterns, a skills baseline before kick-off, per-team mastery reporting, and capstones scoped against your actual backlog so the output is deployable work rather than an exercise.

Which specialisation should I take?

Take the domain you deploy into. If you move across industries, take a tech-stack program instead and pick up domain context on the engagement. The chooser on the programs page will narrow it.

How current is the material?

The trends, platform capabilities and regulatory positions are reviewed each quarter, and every external claim on these pages links to its source so you can check the date yourself.

What do I actually leave with?

A graded portfolio: forty machine-graded labs, two reviewed end-to-end agent builds with measured evaluation and cost per task, and a verifiable credential naming your specialisation.

Still deciding?

Tell us the systems you deploy into and we will say plainly whether this specialisation is the right one — or which of the 21 is.

Talk to us