Program 19 · Tech stack specialisation

SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI EngineerAnthropic + AWS Tech Stack

The Claude-on-AWS stack is where long-running, tool-heavy agents have matured fastest. AgentCore gives you runtime, memory, identity, gateway and observability as managed services — which moves the engineering problem from plumbing to judgement: what should the agent be allowed to do, for how long.

  • 60 hrstaught
  • 20hands-on AI labs
  • 4assessment tests
  • +20 hrs2 E2E capstones
GAAmazon Bedrock AgentCore generally available from end of April 2026AWS
8 hoursMaximum autonomous agent run length with automatic scalingAWS
7Managed AgentCore services: Runtime, Memory, Identity, Gateway, Code Interpreter, Browser, ObservabilityAWS
May 2026Claude Platform on AWS GA — native API, Managed Agents and skills, billed through AWSAnthropic
01
Part 1 · The business

The value chain, the people, the trends

Part 1 is the delivery lifecycle, and what each stage looks like specifically on Claude and AWS.

The agent delivery lifecycle on AWS

Six stages. Select one to see what it means on this stack.

Who you work with on this stack

AWS engagements live or die on the IAM conversation. Select one to light the stages they own.

What is changing on this stack

The 2026 read on Claude and AWS.

Where these numbers come from — 2 sources

Consulted when this program was written, in July 2026. Each entry names the claim on this page that it backs, so the pairing stays checkable if the copy is later edited.

  1. IndustryAWS Weekly Roundup: Amazon Bedrock AgentCore CLI (April 2026)AgentCore GA, CDK deployment pipeline
  2. IndustryClaude by Anthropic — models in Amazon BedrockClaude tiers and managed agent services on AWS
02
Part 2 · Data and meaning

The platform building blocks

Part 2 is the AWS stack in concrete terms, and where the platform gives you something you would otherwise have had to build.

The platform landscape

Six building blocks you will use on almost every engagement.

Models

Claude model tiers through Bedrock or the native Claude API on AWS.

Claude via Bedrock, Claude Platform on AWS

Agent runtime

Managed execution, memory and identity for long-running agents.

Bedrock AgentCore Runtime / Memory / Identity

Tools & gateway

MCP tools, managed gateway, code interpreter and browser tooling.

AgentCore Gateway, Code Interpreter, Browser

Retrieval

Knowledge bases and vector stores with reranking.

Bedrock Knowledge Bases, OpenSearch, pgvector

Security

IAM, agent identity, guardrails and private networking.

IAM, AgentCore Identity, Bedrock Guardrails, PrivateLink

Operations

Deployment pipeline, tracing, metrics and cost telemetry.

AgentCore CLI/CDK, Observability, CloudWatch
03
Part 2 · The architecture

How it is actually built

The layers a deployment needs, what each one holds, and what the engineer owns there.

The reference architecture

Six layers. Click one to see components and SCDAI engineer responsibilities.

What you will actually use

Models
  • Claude tiers via Bedrock
  • Claude Platform on AWS native API
  • Prompt caching and batch
Agents
  • AgentCore Runtime and Memory
  • Managed Agents and skills
  • MCP tools via Gateway
Grounding
  • Bedrock Knowledge Bases
  • OpenSearch / pgvector
  • Reranking
Tools
  • Code Interpreter
  • Browser tool
  • Custom MCP servers
Security
  • IAM least privilege
  • AgentCore Identity
  • Bedrock Guardrails
  • PrivateLink
Operations
  • AgentCore CLI and CDK
  • AgentCore Observability
  • CloudWatch + OTel

Constraints that shape the design

Long runs need hard bounds

An eight-hour autonomous run without budget, loop and blast-radius limits is an incident generator. Bound it in code.

IAM is the security conversation

Agent permissions resolve to IAM. Scope roles per tool, not per agent, and expect the review to be thorough.

Code and browser tools are the risk

These are the highest-value and highest-risk tools. Sandboxing and egress control are mandatory, not optional.

Memory needs a scope and a lifetime

Unbounded agent memory grows cost and leaks context across sessions. Decide scope, retention and eviction up front.

04
Part 3 · Getting it done

Where the business and the technology meet

Part 3 is the set of patterns you will build repeatedly on this stack, then the modules, labs and capstones that prove you can run them in production.

Patterns, mapped to the lifecycle and the architecture

Filter by lifecycle stage or by earned autonomy. Selecting a use case jumps the value chain and the architecture to the stage and layer it depends on.

Value chain stage
Autonomy earned
12 use cases

The delivery playbook

How an AWS engagement actually runs.

01

Day 1 — choose the access path

Bedrock, Claude Platform on AWS, or both. Decide on workload characteristics, not preference, and confirm region availability.

02

Week 1 — grounding and citations

Build retrieval with resolvable citations and measure recall before any agent logic exists.

03

Week 2-3 — agent with hard bounds

Build on AgentCore with budget, loop and blast-radius limits from the first commit, not later.

04

Week 4-5 — IAM and trajectory evals

Take least-privilege scoping to security early, and build trajectory-level evaluation while the agent is still simple.

05

Week 6 — pipeline and handover

Move to CDK deployment, measure cost per completed task and hand over runbook, evals and rollback.

The curriculum

4 modules, 60 taught hours, 20 hands-on labs and 4 assessments — every lab provisioned and graded by the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground. Open a module to see its labs.

01Claude and AWS foundationsAccess paths, model tiering, context strategy and the cost levers that matter.15 hrs · 5 labs
Bedrock vs Claude Platform on AWSModel tieringLong contextPrompt cachingStructured outputsCost per task
01
First agentDeploy a Claude agent through Bedrock with a scoped IAM role.
02
Tiering studyCompare tiers on a real task and choose on cost per task.
03
Prompt cachingCut cost with caching and measure the actual saving.
04
Structured outputsEnforce schema-valid outputs and handle failure paths.
05
Cost baselineEstablish cost per completed task including failures.
Assessment 01 — Platform foundations30 items · 45 min · pass 70%
02Grounding and retrieval on AWSKnowledge bases, vector stores, reranking and citations that hold up.15 hrs · 5 labs
Knowledge BasesOpenSearch and pgvectorChunkingRerankingCitation contractsRetrieval evaluation
01
Knowledge baseBuild a knowledge base and measure recall on a labelled set.
02
Custom retrievalBuild a custom retrieval path and compare it honestly.
03
RerankingAdd reranking and quantify the precision gain.
04
Citation resolutionGuarantee every citation resolves to a source passage.
05
Retrieval evalsGate builds on recall@k and citation correctness.
Assessment 02 — Retrieval & grounding30 items · 45 min · pass 70%
03AgentCore: runtime, memory, tools and identityLong-running agents built on managed services rather than bespoke infrastructure.15 hrs · 5 labs
AgentCore RuntimeMemory scopingGateway and MCPSkillsCode Interpreter and BrowserContainment
01
AgentCore runtimeRun a long-horizon agent with checkpointing and recovery.
02
Memory scopingScope memory with retention and eviction, and prove no cross-session leak.
03
MCP via GatewayExpose an enterprise system as a managed MCP tool.
04
Sandboxed codeEnable code execution with egress and resource containment.
05
ContainmentAdd budget, loop and blast-radius limits and test them under abuse.
Assessment 03 — AgentCore, tools & memory30 items · 45 min · pass 70%
04Evaluation, security and productionTrajectory evaluation, IAM, guardrails, deployment and the cost model.15 hrs · 5 labs
Trajectory evaluationRegression gatingIAM least privilegeGuardrailsCDK deploymentObservability and cost
01
Trajectory evalsEvaluate whole runs, not just final answers, and baseline them.
02
Regression gateBlock deployment on a task-success regression.
03
IAM scopingScope permissions per tool and prove the agent cannot exceed them.
04
GuardrailsAdd input and output guardrails and defeat an injection attempt.
05
Deploy and traceDeploy via CDK, trace a full run and halve cost per completed task.
Assessment 04 — Evaluation, security & operations35 items · 50 min · pass 70%

Two capstones — 20 hours

End-to-end agent design, development, deployment and testing, 10 hours each. Reviewed by a Senior SCDAI Engineer against a published rubric.

Capstone A — Long-running workflow agent

Build an agent on AgentCore that completes a multi-hour workflow with scoped memory, checkpointed recovery, hard bounds and trajectory-level evaluation.

Capstone B — Tool-heavy analysis agent

Build an agent using sandboxed code execution and MCP tools over enterprise data, with least-privilege IAM, guardrails and a measured cost per completed task.

What you deliver, and how it is marked
  • A running agent, deployed on the program's target stack, reachable by a reviewer.
  • An architecture note: boundaries, tools, autonomy level and the trade-offs you took.
  • A versioned eval set with a baseline and your final scores.
  • A trace walkthrough of one success and one deliberate failure.
  • Cost per task, measured — not estimated.
  • A runbook and rollback path a client team could operate on Monday.
Problem fit15%Is this a decision worth automating, scoped to a defensible boundary?
Architecture20%Right pattern for the constraints; autonomy earned, not assumed.
Grounding & accuracy20%Measured groundedness against the eval set, with the failures named.
Safety & compliance20%Domain controls actually enforced, and demonstrably so.
Operability15%Traces, runbook, rollback, cost — could someone else run this?
Communication10%Can a client executive follow the reasoning in ten minutes?

One lab, start to finish

Every lab in this program follows the shape below. This is lab 03 in full — the brief you are given, the environment that is provisioned for you, the code you start from and the assertions that decide whether you passed.

Module 03 · AgentCore: runtime, memory, tools and identity

Long-run containment

Bound an eight-hour agent so failure is recoverable and cost is predictable.

The brief

Build an AgentCore agent for a multi-hour task, then break it deliberately: kill it mid-run, exhaust a tool, and feed it a loop-inducing input. It must recover, terminate and stay inside budget.

Provisioned for you
  • AgentCore runtime and memory
  • Fault injector for tool and node failure
  • Cost meter per run
  • Loop-inducing input set
You start from this
LIMITS = dict(max_tokens=..., max_tool_calls=..., max_wall_clock=..., blast_radius=...)

def run(task, checkpoint_store):
    """Checkpoint often enough that a kill at hour four costs minutes."""
    raise NotImplementedError
What the grader asserts
  1. A kill at any point resumes without repeating completed side effects
  2. Loop-inducing inputs terminate at the configured limit, every time
  3. Cost per completed task stays within 15% of the projection
  4. Every step is traceable after the fact from spans alone
  5. Memory does not grow unbounded across the run

Pass barAll fault injections recovered, all loops terminated, cost within projection.

StretchAdd trajectory-level evaluation scoring tool choice, not just the final answer.

05
Assessment

Assessed, not attended

Every module ends with a timed, randomised assessment delivered through the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground. The certificate requires a pass on all of them plus two reviewed capstones.

Assessment blueprint

What each test covers, how long it runs, and how many items are currently in the versioned bank behind it.

#Assessment & coverageItemsTimeIn bank
01Platform foundationsAccess pathsModel tieringContext and cachingCost per task3045 min4
02Retrieval & groundingKnowledge basesVector stores and rerankingCitationsRetrieval metrics3045 min4
03AgentCore, tools & memoryRuntime and long runsMemory scopingMCP and toolsContainment3045 min4
04Evaluation, security & operationsTrajectory evaluationIAM and guardrailsDeployment pipelineObservability and cost3550 min4
Single best answerOne defensible option among plausible distractors drawn from real field mistakes.
Scenario judgementA client situation with constraints; you pick the action a Senior SCDAI Engineer would take.
Architecture selectionGiven non-functional requirements, choose the pattern and justify the trade-off.
Failure diagnosisA trace, an eval report or a cost curve — identify the root cause.
  • Each module ends with a timed assessment; the program certificate requires a pass on every one.
  • Items are drawn at random from a versioned bank, so no two learners sit an identical paper.
  • Pass mark is 70%. Two retakes are included, each with a fresh draw.
  • Scenario items carry double weight — they are the ones that predict field performance.
  • Capstones are reviewed against a published rubric by a Senior SCDAI Engineer, not auto-graded.

Try four questions from the bank

Real items, drawn from 16 in this program's bank — weighted toward the scenario and diagnosis types, because those are the ones that predict field performance. Instant feedback, nothing saved.

Four sample items — one attempt each, then the reasoning is shown.

Q1Why measure cost per completed task rather than per token?

Excluding failures flatters every comparison. The completed unit of work is what compares to the process being replaced.

Q2When would you build custom retrieval rather than using a managed knowledge base?

Custom retrieval is a maintenance commitment. It should be justified by a measured gap, not assumed superiority.

Q3An agent may run autonomously for up to eight hours. What must exist?

Long runs multiply the consequences of any error. Containment and recovery are prerequisites, not enhancements.

Q4Why is trajectory-level evaluation necessary for long-running agents?

Single-turn evaluation of a multi-hour agent measures the wrong thing. The trajectory is the behaviour.

06
Career & outcomes

What this makes you, and where it goes next

The same ladder whichever specialisation you enter through — what changes is the domain you go deep in. Below: how the program is delivered, the skills it moves, the roles it leads to, and the specialisations closest to this one.

Available two ways

The same labs, assessments and capstones, delivered to an enterprise cohort or to individual professionals.

B2B

Direct to enterprise

Cohorts of 20 to 2,000+ on your own tenancy, with your data patterns and your cloud. Skill-gap baselining up front, per-team mastery reporting throughout, and capstones scoped against your real backlog so the output is deployable work.

  • Private cohort on your tenancy
  • Baseline skills assessment before kick-off
  • Capstones scoped to your backlog
  • Per-team mastery dashboards for L&D
  • Optional Senior SCDAI Engineer architecture reviews
B2C

Direct to individual professionals

The same labs, assessments and capstones for individual engineers and analysts, run on shared infrastructure with a fixed cohort calendar. You leave with a graded portfolio, not a certificate of attendance.

  • Fixed-date cohorts, self-paced within them
  • Same graded labs and item bank
  • Portfolio-ready capstones you own
  • Certificate on a pass in every module
  • Community and office-hours access

Skill matrix

Find your row and aim one column right. The Playground scores you against this after every module.

SkillBeginnerIntermediateAdvanced
AWS platformCalls Bedrock.Builds on AgentCore managed services.Designs an agent estate with IAM and cost discipline.
Long-horizon agentsRuns a single-turn agent.Builds multi-step agents with memory.Designs hour-long runs with recovery and bounds.
Agent containmentAdds output filters.Scopes IAM and sandboxes tools.Threat-models a tool estate and proves containment.
Context engineeringWrites clear prompts.Structures retrieval, tools and state deliberately.Designs context strategy for reliability and cost at scale.
Retrieval & groundingBuilds basic vector search.Tunes chunking, hybrid search and reranking.Designs graph + vector grounding with measured recall.
Agent orchestrationRuns a single tool-calling agent.Builds supervised multi-step and multi-agent flows.Designs autonomy boundaries and failure containment.
Tool & system integrationCalls a documented API.Writes an MCP server over a system of record.Designs a least-privilege tool estate across systems.
EvaluationEyeballs outputs.Builds labelled eval sets and regression gates.Runs online evals with drift and judge calibration.
Observability & costReads logs.Traces runs, tracks tokens and latency.Owns cost per task and capacity planning in production.
Security & guardrailsAdds output filters.Mitigates the OWASP LLM Top 10 in a build.Threat-models an agent estate and proves controls.
Client deliveryTakes notes in a workshop.Runs discovery and scopes a thin slice.Owns the account technically, from scope to handover.

Where it takes you

The SCDAI ladder is the same whichever specialisation you enter through — what changes is the domain you go deep in.

01
Data and AI EngineerEntry
Python, LLM APIs, first RAG build, prompt and context basics.
02
Associate Data and AI EngineerPractitioner
Client-facing discovery, tool integration, agent build under supervision.
03
SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI EngineerSpecialist
Owns a deployment end to end — scoping, build, evals, handover.
04
Senior Data and AI Engineer / Domain LeadSenior
Multi-agent architecture, regulated deployments, reference patterns for the practice.
05
AI Architect / Practice LeadLeadership
Portfolio of accounts, delivery standards, hiring and capability strategy.
Terms worth knowing
AgentCore
Amazon Bedrock’s managed services for running agents in production.
Gateway
The AgentCore service that exposes tools, including MCP servers, to agents.
Skills
Packaged, reusable procedure a Claude agent can invoke, instead of prompt text.
Trajectory evaluation
Evaluating the whole sequence of an agent run, not only its final output.
Prompt caching
Reusing stable context across calls to reduce cost and latency.
Blast radius
The maximum damage an agent action can cause before a control stops it.
PrivateLink
Private network connectivity to AWS services without public internet transit.
Checkpointing
Persisting agent state so a long run can resume after failure.
SCDAI
SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI Engineer — the credential this program awards.
SCDAI engineer
An engineer embedded with the customer who turns their constraints into a working system.
Thin slice
The narrowest end-to-end path through a workflow that still produces business value.
Agentic RAG
Retrieval where the agent decides when, what and how often to retrieve.
MCP
Model Context Protocol — open standard connecting an agent to tools and data.
A2A
Agent2Agent — protocol for agent-to-agent delegation across vendors.
Eval set
A labelled, versioned set of cases an agent must pass before release.
LLM-as-judge
Using a model to score outputs, calibrated periodically against human ratings.
Guardrail
An enforced constraint on an input, output or action — not a prompt request.
Human-in-the-loop
A required human approval step before a consequential action executes.
Cost per task
Total token, tool and compute cost of one completed unit of work — the engineer's unit economic.
Golden path
The reference architecture a practice standardises on so deployments stay reviewable.
Handover
The point at which the client can operate, evaluate and change the system without the engineer.

Related programs

Skill a team, or join a cohort

B2B cohorts run on your tenancy with capstones scoped to your backlog. B2C cohorts run on a fixed calendar.

Talk to us
07
Enrolling

What you need, what you get, and what it costs

Stated plainly enough to rule yourself in or out without a sales call: the prerequisites, how the program runs, exactly what the credential is worth, and the questions everyone asks.

Before you start

Stated plainly so you can rule yourself in or out without a sales call. Nothing here is a formal qualification — it is what the first lab assumes you can already do.

Technical

You should already be able to do these

  • Comfortable in Python: functions, typing, virtual environments, reading a stack trace
  • Have called an LLM API and handled a structured response
  • Git, the command line, and reading someone else’s code without panic

Domain

What we assume, and what we teach

  • An AWS account you can deploy into, or your employer’s sandbox
  • Basic IAM literacy — roles and policies, not mastery

Time and access

What the program asks of your week

  • A machine that can run a browser and a terminal — labs run in the Playground, not locally
  • Roughly 8 hours a week for the taught weeks, plus 20 hours for the two capstones

How it runs

Cohort dates and pricing are confirmed on enquiry rather than printed here, because both move with the intake.

Format
Self-paced within a fixed cohort window, delivered in the SCIKIQ Agentic AI Playground
Taught hours
60 hours across 4 modules
Capstones
20 hours — two end-to-end builds, reviewed not auto-graded
Typical duration
10–12 weeks at around 8 hours a week
Level
Intermediate → Advanced
Built for
Engineers deploying Claude-based agents on AWS
Next cohorts
— confirmed on enquiry
Pricing
— confirmed on enquiry

The credential

The credential is awarded per specialisation, so it names the domain or stack you were assessed in rather than claiming general competence. On this program the badge reads SCDAI — Anthropic + AWS Tech Stack.

How it is earned

  • A pass at 70% or above on every module assessment — not an average across them
  • Both capstones reviewed against the published rubric by a Senior SCDAI Engineer
  • All labs submitted and machine-graded green
Awarded as
A verifiable digital badge with a public credential record
Valid for
Two years from award
Recertification
One current-year assessment plus a refreshed capstone
Retakes
Two included per assessment, each with a fresh item draw
Named specialisation
The badge states the domain or stack, e.g. SCDAI — Healthcare
Verification
Third parties confirm a holder from the credential record, no login required

A certificate that cannot be checked is decoration. Every award resolves to a record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

The certificate you leave with

This is the credential the program awards, shown exactly as it is issued — with the specialisation named, the assessment record attached and a verification link anyone can check without an account.

SCIKIQ Data Academy Certificate of Professional Certification

This is to certify that

Your name

has been assessed and certified as

SCIKIQ Certified Data and AI Engineer

Anthropic + AWS Tech Stack

Specialisation
Anthropic + AWS Tech Stack
Assessments passed
4 of 4, each at 70% or above
Labs graded
20 of 20 machine-graded green
Capstones reviewed
2, against the published rubric
Taught hours
60 across 4 modules, plus 20 capstone hours
AwardedOn completion
Valid untilTwo years from award
Credential IDSCDAI-ANTHROPIC-AW-<issued>
Senior SCDAI Engineer, Certification Board
  1. 01
    The specialisation is on the certificate

    Not “Data and AI Engineer” but the domain or stack you were actually assessed in. A general claim would be a weaker one.

  2. 02
    The assessment record travels with it

    Modules passed, labs graded and both capstones reviewed — so the credential states what was measured rather than that you attended.

  3. 03
    Anyone can verify it, without a login

    The credential ID resolves to a public record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

Share it on LinkedIn

Add it to your LinkedIn profile in one step. The link pre-fills the certification fields from the credential record, so the entry on your profile matches the record a reader can check.

Add to LinkedIn profile The button is live on your real certificate; here it opens LinkedIn pre-filled with this specialisation so you can see exactly what the profile entry will say.

A certificate that cannot be checked is decoration. Every award resolves to a record showing the specialisation, the award date and the assessments passed.

Questions we get asked

The objections that come up in every conversation about this program, answered without the brochure voice.

Is this a course or a certification?

Both, and the second is the point. Eight timed assessments and two reviewed capstones stand between you and the credential, so a pass means someone measured the skill rather than recorded your attendance.

How is it self-paced without falling apart?

Every lab is provisioned, graded and unblocked by the Playground rather than by an instructor. That is what lets a cohort of 2,000 cost the same faculty time as a cohort of 20 — and why you are never waiting on someone to mark your work.

What if I fail an assessment?

Two retakes are included per assessment, each drawing a fresh item set from the bank, so a retake is a genuinely new paper rather than the same questions again.

Do I need my own cloud account?

For the domain specialisations, no — labs run in provisioned sandboxes. For the four tech-stack programs you will want access to that platform, since deploying into a real subscription is much of the point.

Can we run this privately for our team?

Yes. B2B cohorts run on your own tenancy with your data patterns, a skills baseline before kick-off, per-team mastery reporting, and capstones scoped against your actual backlog so the output is deployable work rather than an exercise.

Which specialisation should I take?

Take the domain you deploy into. If you move across industries, take a tech-stack program instead and pick up domain context on the engagement. The chooser on the programs page will narrow it.

How current is the material?

The trends, platform capabilities and regulatory positions are reviewed each quarter, and every external claim on these pages links to its source so you can check the date yourself.

What do I actually leave with?

A graded portfolio: forty machine-graded labs, two reviewed end-to-end agent builds with measured evaluation and cost per task, and a verifiable credential naming your specialisation.

Still deciding?

Tell us the systems you deploy into and we will say plainly whether this specialisation is the right one — or which of the 21 is.

Talk to us